Though there were slight differences, the game remained largely the same for both seasons. The earliest example of this I can remember is the Game Show Network original Friend or Foe, airing two 65-episode seasons from June 2002 to April 2003. There are many, many, many pieces all around the Internet that dives deep into this, and they’re worth the look if you have time.
If both suspects rat out the other, they both get a long sentence.īasically, the Prisoner’s Dilemma can turn perfectly reasonable and rational people greedy, as you’ll see soon enough.If one of the suspects rats out the other, but the other doesn’t, the one that turned the deal down gets the long sentence, while the one that took the deal goes free.If Suspect A and Suspect B keep silent, they both get the lesser sentence on the lesser charge (or go free).From there, there are three possible outcomes: So prosecutors have to get one of them to basically blame the other for the crime in exchange for a lesser sentence or immunity or some other perk (and the suspect has to make the decision without the knowledge that the other person is being offered the same deal too in a separate room).
#Game show presenter plus final round free
Because of the lack of evidence, there’s a chance the two could basically get away it and go free or get a lesser sentence. Tucker named it the prisoner’s dilemma, and is one of the most important and well-known game theories ever created.įor the uninitiated, the Prisoner’s Dilemma works like this: two people are accused of or charged with a crime, but there’s a lack of sufficient evidence to convict them. The Prisoner’s Dilemma was construed by Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher working at think tank the Research and Development Corporation, or simply RAND, in 1950. In the 2000s, the Prisoner’s Dilemma made its way to an unlikely place: the game show.
0 kommentar(er)
